Cindy Sheehan, formerly a grieving mother and currently an Iraq War protester was arrested today in Washington DC along with several of her cohorts for "demonstrating without a permit." What kind of a bullshit charge is that? It seems to go against something... something that most American's forget:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
It seems to me that these people were doing just this. Peaceably assembling and petitioning the government for a redress of grievances. And they were arrested for it.
2005-09-26
2005-09-25
Choice & Personal Responsiblity
There seems to be a big push for personal responsibility in this country. Politicians frequently say that people should responsible for the choices that they make, but how can this happen when governments make choices for them?
A good example are the recent hurricanes. Though Rita was much less disastrous than Katrina, many people lost their homes during both storms, or were burned to death in a bus. In both cases, although people lost their homes, almost all are being compensated in one way or another by the federal government, in effect removing the responsiblity of the victims. They aren't all victims. Thousands of people chose to not evacuate or were not able to due to lack of reliable transportation. These same people chose to live on a coastal city that is prone to hurricanes. By living in an area like that without the means to leave quickly, they sealed their own fates. They could have prepared by either planning for such a disaster in advance or moving to an area that would not require evacuations from hurricanes.
Now I probably lost most of my readers. You are probably thinking that we shouldn't be so hard on these people, since they are poor, immobile, etc. Everyone is responsible for their own actions. I shouldn't be responsible to bail them out for it. We're going to soon bail out Trent Lott, the Mississippi senator. He lost his beach front house during Hurricane Katrina. Most people would argue that he doesn't deserve the federal aid and I agree. But I go a step further in saying that nobody deserves federal aid, except for people who have been fucked over by the federal government.
And for all of you who were too cheap to give to the Red Cross... don't worry, the federal government has made a non-transparent, non-accountable (i.e. subject to corruption, like the oil for food program), $600 (and climbing) donation to the Hurricane Victims on your behalf. This money will be used for wholesome services like lap-dances. Although, if the federal government gave me free money, I think that would be quite a suitable thing to spend it on...
Back to the main point. If you want personal responsiblity to actually exist, then let it. Don't bail anybody out. Send them a bumper sticker letting them know what happens, and tell them don't come crying because your coastal city got flooded. Build again with your own money or move.
A good example are the recent hurricanes. Though Rita was much less disastrous than Katrina, many people lost their homes during both storms, or were burned to death in a bus. In both cases, although people lost their homes, almost all are being compensated in one way or another by the federal government, in effect removing the responsiblity of the victims. They aren't all victims. Thousands of people chose to not evacuate or were not able to due to lack of reliable transportation. These same people chose to live on a coastal city that is prone to hurricanes. By living in an area like that without the means to leave quickly, they sealed their own fates. They could have prepared by either planning for such a disaster in advance or moving to an area that would not require evacuations from hurricanes.
Now I probably lost most of my readers. You are probably thinking that we shouldn't be so hard on these people, since they are poor, immobile, etc. Everyone is responsible for their own actions. I shouldn't be responsible to bail them out for it. We're going to soon bail out Trent Lott, the Mississippi senator. He lost his beach front house during Hurricane Katrina. Most people would argue that he doesn't deserve the federal aid and I agree. But I go a step further in saying that nobody deserves federal aid, except for people who have been fucked over by the federal government.
And for all of you who were too cheap to give to the Red Cross... don't worry, the federal government has made a non-transparent, non-accountable (i.e. subject to corruption, like the oil for food program), $600 (and climbing) donation to the Hurricane Victims on your behalf. This money will be used for wholesome services like lap-dances. Although, if the federal government gave me free money, I think that would be quite a suitable thing to spend it on...
Back to the main point. If you want personal responsiblity to actually exist, then let it. Don't bail anybody out. Send them a bumper sticker letting them know what happens, and tell them don't come crying because your coastal city got flooded. Build again with your own money or move.
2005-09-23
2nd Still Applies in LA
As New Orleans braces for another Hurricane Rita, the citizens can take relief in the fact that they can still protect themselves. Today Judge Jay Zainey granted a motion by the NRA to stop gun confiscation in New Orleans. I wrote earlier about this bullshit taking place in the big easy, the disarmament of civilians empowers criminals and corrupt law enforcement, NEVER A GOOD THING. The police must also return all guns to those who legally owned them. This is a major victory for the country, against the same corrupt idiots who let this whole thing take place. Had New Orleans been run more like a civilized city than like a third world hellhole, this might not have happened in the first place.
The left leaning media hasn't (or won't) publish this yet, so visit www.nra.org for more info.
The left leaning media hasn't (or won't) publish this yet, so visit www.nra.org for more info.
2005-09-20
Should Roberts be confirmed?
In a word, yes.
Judge John Roberts seems to be the best nominee for Supreme Court Justice since Clarence Thomas, the only justice who I can stomach. While I'd rather see Alex Kozinski as a member of SCOTUS, here's why Roberts is a good choice:
Democrats would be foolish to vote against him en masse since he is probably the most neutral person they could expect George W to nominate. Not that he's a bad nominee in any way. His history suggests that he is one of the most intelligent people ever to be nominated for this position and that he strongly regards the Constitution, something that seems to have been put on the back burner lately.
It remains to be seen what his interpretations are of this great document, but at least he refers to it more than a lot of the current justices (Souter, who provided that AWFUL decision Kelo v New London a few months ago, telling homeowners to go fuck themselves).
At any rate, Roberts seems like a standup guy and its all but assured that he will be confirmed. I'll be following him closely and will give all of you the straight dope on his opinions.
Judge John Roberts seems to be the best nominee for Supreme Court Justice since Clarence Thomas, the only justice who I can stomach. While I'd rather see Alex Kozinski as a member of SCOTUS, here's why Roberts is a good choice:
Democrats would be foolish to vote against him en masse since he is probably the most neutral person they could expect George W to nominate. Not that he's a bad nominee in any way. His history suggests that he is one of the most intelligent people ever to be nominated for this position and that he strongly regards the Constitution, something that seems to have been put on the back burner lately.
It remains to be seen what his interpretations are of this great document, but at least he refers to it more than a lot of the current justices (Souter, who provided that AWFUL decision Kelo v New London a few months ago, telling homeowners to go fuck themselves).
At any rate, Roberts seems like a standup guy and its all but assured that he will be confirmed. I'll be following him closely and will give all of you the straight dope on his opinions.
2005-09-09
No Aid to Black People
Now that racism has been injected into the Hurrican Katrina situation, I'd like to make a comment of my own.
I don't think any federal aid should go to black people.
Wow that must mean I'm a racist.
Not really, I don't believe that federal aid should be given to black people, white people, brown people, or green people.
See, if the government just refused to help anyone, we wouldn't have this race issue even being brought up.
If Kanye West wants to do something positive he should sell some of his bling and donate it to the Red Cross.
Furthermore, why blame Bush, because its easy to blame the white man for everything? What about the failed mayor of New Orleans, who just happens to be black, and was the cause of many more problems in that city than Bush could even think of.
I don't think any federal aid should go to black people.
Wow that must mean I'm a racist.
Not really, I don't believe that federal aid should be given to black people, white people, brown people, or green people.
See, if the government just refused to help anyone, we wouldn't have this race issue even being brought up.
If Kanye West wants to do something positive he should sell some of his bling and donate it to the Red Cross.
Furthermore, why blame Bush, because its easy to blame the white man for everything? What about the failed mayor of New Orleans, who just happens to be black, and was the cause of many more problems in that city than Bush could even think of.
Making a Bad Situation WORSE
If you had already lost your house, your money, all your possessions, and most of your dignity, would you like the police to tell you that you better just spread your legs and let the rapist do his business? That's what's happening in good ole New Orleans. The Washington Post reports that police have begun confiscating LEGALLY owned firearms, to help make the forced evacuation go over easier.
So, the evacuees are most likely at least 75% innocent civilians and the rest criminals to one degree or another. Shouldn't the majority be allowed to defend themselves against crime? Wasn't the 2nd Amendment put into place for EXACTLY these kinds of situations, situations in which there is a defacto lawlessness and it's everyman for himself?
This is simply illegal. You can bet that if they tried to take away my 9mm it would have to be from my COLD DEAD HANDS. I applaud any law abiding New Orleans gun owners who ACTIVELY RESIST this forced disarmament.
So, the evacuees are most likely at least 75% innocent civilians and the rest criminals to one degree or another. Shouldn't the majority be allowed to defend themselves against crime? Wasn't the 2nd Amendment put into place for EXACTLY these kinds of situations, situations in which there is a defacto lawlessness and it's everyman for himself?
This is simply illegal. You can bet that if they tried to take away my 9mm it would have to be from my COLD DEAD HANDS. I applaud any law abiding New Orleans gun owners who ACTIVELY RESIST this forced disarmament.
2005-09-06
Gouging doesn't exist
People are going haywire over the supposed gas-shortage, which most likely is not a shortage at all. Many service stations are scared that their supplies wouldn't come in today and most likely raised prices over the weekend so they could handle a few days with the pumps dry. The problem is when the government steps in to "help", something they always do very poorly. Where I live, in the Commonwealth of Virginia, Governor Mark Warner decided to enforce the states anti price gouging law against a Shell station in my town, Centreville, that was charging $5.80 a gallon on Friday. Charging $5.80 a gallon may seem very high, but the stations down the street were charging $3.49 or so. The shell station was probably trying to hold off demand until after the weekend so they wouldn't run dry. Well, after the government's involvement they were down to $2.85 and dry within a day. They probably lost money in the process.
If people are willing to pay for gas at $5.80, which would be the case for some people that commute (though public transportation is always a substitute), there are probably many people who would not pay that much for gas and choose to use their vehicles more wisely. The bottom line would be that gas would be expensive, but it would be available. As can be seen at that Shell station, when the government forces a price (just like the central planners in Moscow), some companies will choose not to sell at all.
The choice comes down to this. Would you rather have $5 gas available at every station, or a defacto ban on driving more than a day a week if there were indeed shortages? I'll take the $5 gas, because at least then I'd have the choice not to drive instead of the government making the decision for me.
Besides, if the government really cared about gas prices, they would repeal the federal tax of 18.4 cents per gallon. States take in even more, ranging from around 18 cents to over 30 in communist enclaves like NY. Let's take Michigan, State of my birth, as an example. If gas costs $3.00 per gallon, that includes 18.4 cents federal tax plus 19 cents state tax and about .75 cents for "environmental fees." Let's not forget the 6% sales tax either. Taking away all these taxes would have consumers paying $2.46 per gallon. And that's just at the state and federal level. Don't forget the counties and cities that add a few more cents per gallon. Most other regions would have similar results, check out the link in this paragraph to see exactly how much your state bills you.
If people are willing to pay for gas at $5.80, which would be the case for some people that commute (though public transportation is always a substitute), there are probably many people who would not pay that much for gas and choose to use their vehicles more wisely. The bottom line would be that gas would be expensive, but it would be available. As can be seen at that Shell station, when the government forces a price (just like the central planners in Moscow), some companies will choose not to sell at all.
The choice comes down to this. Would you rather have $5 gas available at every station, or a defacto ban on driving more than a day a week if there were indeed shortages? I'll take the $5 gas, because at least then I'd have the choice not to drive instead of the government making the decision for me.
Besides, if the government really cared about gas prices, they would repeal the federal tax of 18.4 cents per gallon. States take in even more, ranging from around 18 cents to over 30 in communist enclaves like NY. Let's take Michigan, State of my birth, as an example. If gas costs $3.00 per gallon, that includes 18.4 cents federal tax plus 19 cents state tax and about .75 cents for "environmental fees." Let's not forget the 6% sales tax either. Taking away all these taxes would have consumers paying $2.46 per gallon. And that's just at the state and federal level. Don't forget the counties and cities that add a few more cents per gallon. Most other regions would have similar results, check out the link in this paragraph to see exactly how much your state bills you.
2005-08-31
The Hurricane
Watch out for your pocketbooks, the government is now mobilizing to spend billions of our tax dollars cleaning up after Hurricane Katrina. While I support the numerous charities, such as the Red Cross, I do not support the government spending money to clean this up. The residents of New Orleans chose to live there, on the coast, in an area that is no stranger to bad weather. We should support the people whose lives were affected, but rebuilding the area seems to be an awful waste of money. The poor of New Orleans should think very hard about moving back there. Many of them had little to begin with, relocating to a more prosperous area is probably more feasible than returning home.
We have truly become a welfare society. If something bad happens, we expect the government to bail us out, which goes against our country's core principle: independence. Where charity falls short, insurance doesn't apply, that should simply be lost, not taken from the rest of the country without their consent. I'm sure many Americans, living in a lower tax environment, would gladly donate some of the extra 30% of their income to relief efforts, which generally do a much better job at managing the funds.
Referring to government relief destined for grain farmers facing a drought, one of our greatest presidents, Grover Cleveland remarked that, "Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the Government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character...."
I couldn't agree more.
We have truly become a welfare society. If something bad happens, we expect the government to bail us out, which goes against our country's core principle: independence. Where charity falls short, insurance doesn't apply, that should simply be lost, not taken from the rest of the country without their consent. I'm sure many Americans, living in a lower tax environment, would gladly donate some of the extra 30% of their income to relief efforts, which generally do a much better job at managing the funds.
Referring to government relief destined for grain farmers facing a drought, one of our greatest presidents, Grover Cleveland remarked that, "Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the Government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character...."
I couldn't agree more.
2005-08-15
""Marijuana makes darkies think they're as good as white men"."
-Harry Anslinger
The first "drug czar" and the person that introduced the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act, effectively banning the substance. It'd be like banning Courvoisier today...stupid, stupid & stupid.
-Harry Anslinger
The first "drug czar" and the person that introduced the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act, effectively banning the substance. It'd be like banning Courvoisier today...stupid, stupid & stupid.
2005-08-11
Drinking on the campaign trail
It is now starting to make the rounds on the internet that Katherine Harris, who supposedly granted her only live interview to Hannity & Colmes on Fox News might have been drunk during the interview. I myself watched the interview last night and found her behavior to be quite bizarre, but did not think much of it until I noticed that Reason had picked up on it. Here's the link to the video.
2005-08-07
DEA problems
Regardless of his intentions, I'm glad that Venezuelen President Chavez has thrown the Drug Enforcement Administration out of his country. This division of the Department Of Justice is one of the most brutal and unnecessary components of the US Government. The so called "drug war" can never be won, and is attack on free will. If someone wants to do drugs, that is their business and not the governments. Drug laws are racist in nature, they were mostly used to screw over Mexicans, blacks, and other groups that the US government did not like. Eventually they went after the whites too with prohibition, but as we all know, that was later appealed. I hope that other world governments stop helping the USA with this expensive hobby. Let people make their own choices. Some may choose drugs, most will not. Either way, it will save taxpayers BILLIONS per year.
2005-08-04
What a game!
What a game for the Nats tonight. John Patterson had a career high 13 streakouts, 0 walks, and his first complete game and first shutout. And Brad Wilkerson (who has the 2nd most strikeouts in the league) had 0 strike outs tonight and the NATS FIRST GRANDSLAM. The final score was 7-0. If only every game went like this...
2005-07-29
Passed: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (S 397) passed today in the Senate by a vote of 65-31. This bill (and its sister in the House) are designed to protect firearms manufacturers from lawsuits by victims of criminals.
Currently, if someone shoots your or a loved one with a legally purchased firearm, you can sue the gun manufacturer for the crime they had nothing to do with. Activists use this to try to bankrupt the firearms industry because they do not believe in the Second Amendment. Thankfully the oldest civil rights organization in the United States, the NRA, stands up for our rights to keep and bear arms, and stand up for the manufacturers who contribute millions to the economy. We should all be thankful for this legislation and all legislation that limits reckless lawsuits against ANY industry.
Currently, if someone shoots your or a loved one with a legally purchased firearm, you can sue the gun manufacturer for the crime they had nothing to do with. Activists use this to try to bankrupt the firearms industry because they do not believe in the Second Amendment. Thankfully the oldest civil rights organization in the United States, the NRA, stands up for our rights to keep and bear arms, and stand up for the manufacturers who contribute millions to the economy. We should all be thankful for this legislation and all legislation that limits reckless lawsuits against ANY industry.
2005-07-25
Unions
The once mighty ALF-CIO is no more. Today the Teamsters and Service Employees International Union withdrew from the organization. This represents a major chunk of the organization and it also highlights the antiquity of unions. At one point unions helped workers by fighting against corporations that exploited them and subjected them to dangerous conditions. In a global market, unions only add to our country's cost of doing business and make us less competitive. American cars cost about the same as a Japanese car but are never designed or built to comparable standards. We can't get close to the Korean's on price. What most people don't know is that most Japanese and Korean cars are built in the USA with non-union workers. They don't have the enormous amount of benefits that someone in the UAW has, but should those workers be entitled to life-long healthcare and pensions? I don't think so. I am also an American worker and I have to pay my way. I pay for part of my healthcare, contribute to my 401(k) and don't think a company should have to make decisions for you.
Unions also take advantage of their members, the fees mostly going to the top of the organization, making people like James Hoffa a millionaire and powerful figure, not to mention that unions support political campaigns under the guise of helping the workers. Where were the unions when Ford and GM sent half their work to Mexico? Maybe the cost of doing business with the union was just too much for those companies and that's why a company like Toyota has been able to ADD jobs to this country.
It's time for unions to go, this is just the beginning.
Unions also take advantage of their members, the fees mostly going to the top of the organization, making people like James Hoffa a millionaire and powerful figure, not to mention that unions support political campaigns under the guise of helping the workers. Where were the unions when Ford and GM sent half their work to Mexico? Maybe the cost of doing business with the union was just too much for those companies and that's why a company like Toyota has been able to ADD jobs to this country.
It's time for unions to go, this is just the beginning.
2005-07-18
More to do
Work has started to get busier. I'm now doing work for my team instead of helping others out. I was having some problems today figuring things out, but I think I have a handle on things now. I'm writing some test scripts for a customization of our software. Doesn't sound too hard, but I don't know the software as well as I'd like to. I also don't have too much help: my "buddy" is out for a month to donate his kidney. He's been really helpful during the first month here, showing me how to do just about everything. Hopefully everything works out for him.
We got a new dresser this weekend, hopefully that will solve our clothes storage problem. Our apartment isn't too small, its just that we had too much stuff from Pittsburgh and we're getting rid of a lot of the junk that we have no use for.
Today I received my VA issued NRA license plate. Buy your own (real or souvenir) plate here: https://www.dmv.state.va.us/dmvnet/souvenir_plate/intro.asp
Speaking of the NRA, we moved our convention out of Columbus, OH because the assholes there just enacted another (useless) assault weapons ban. Most of the idiots in this country assume that means that automatic weapons are now illegal. WRONG. Full autos have been illegal for about 70 years, these are just rifles that look scary to democrats, the same ones who would piss their pants at the sight of a swiss army knife.
In other news, the Bush administration better get rid of Rove quick, else it will look REALLY bad (worse than it already is) to the president.
In more news, our friend from Saudi Arabia seems to have a beef with our friends across the pond. The sad thing is that this will probably lead to more security and less freedom, meaning that the terrorists win again. Maybe instead of trying to go after them like shooting a fly with an elephant gun, we could do something to make them a little more chill with us, like cut off Israel's (and everyone else's) foreign aid. I mean, does it make any sense that we give foreign aid both to Israel and to countries that hate Israel? Let private US citizens donate to countries all they want, remove the government from the equation so we stop getting fucked over because of it.
We got a new dresser this weekend, hopefully that will solve our clothes storage problem. Our apartment isn't too small, its just that we had too much stuff from Pittsburgh and we're getting rid of a lot of the junk that we have no use for.
Today I received my VA issued NRA license plate. Buy your own (real or souvenir) plate here: https://www.dmv.state.va.us/dmvnet/souvenir_plate/intro.asp
Speaking of the NRA, we moved our convention out of Columbus, OH because the assholes there just enacted another (useless) assault weapons ban. Most of the idiots in this country assume that means that automatic weapons are now illegal. WRONG. Full autos have been illegal for about 70 years, these are just rifles that look scary to democrats, the same ones who would piss their pants at the sight of a swiss army knife.
In other news, the Bush administration better get rid of Rove quick, else it will look REALLY bad (worse than it already is) to the president.
In more news, our friend from Saudi Arabia seems to have a beef with our friends across the pond. The sad thing is that this will probably lead to more security and less freedom, meaning that the terrorists win again. Maybe instead of trying to go after them like shooting a fly with an elephant gun, we could do something to make them a little more chill with us, like cut off Israel's (and everyone else's) foreign aid. I mean, does it make any sense that we give foreign aid both to Israel and to countries that hate Israel? Let private US citizens donate to countries all they want, remove the government from the equation so we stop getting fucked over because of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)